şükela:  tümü | bugün
  • dadaengine isimli metin uretici* motoru kullanir. marx, lyotard, rushdie gibi postmodernizm essay'lerinde bol bol adi gecen dusunur/yazarlarin isimlerini araya serpistirir. paradigm, discourse, the other gibi postmodernizmin trade mark'i olmus terimleri de kullanmayi unutmaz. eglendiricidir, alttan alta postmodernizmle dalga gecer. ama postmodernizm hakkindaki asil elestirisinin ne oldugu pek anlasilmaz.

    -bi text pattern algoritmasi yaptim, icine gerekli kelime gruplarini sokunca postmodernizm uyduruyo. gercek gibi valla.
    -sonuc? (bkz: erdener abi)
  • post modernizmi elestirmez aslında post-modernizmi kanıtlar.

    post-modernizmi modernist bir bakış açısından okuyanlar onda hala gizli bir anlam bulmak isterler. halbuki, yazarın inşa ettiği anlam, neden-sonuç ilişkileri bunlar modernizmin sonucudur. post modernizm bunları eleştirir zaten. yani anlamı yazardan alıp okuyan'a verir. ne demek şimdi bu? "the post-modernizm generator" rastgele makaleler üretebilir, ve bunlar anlamsız olabilir; ama okuyucu bunlardan bir anlam bulursa o metin hala değerlidir.

    post-modernizm generatore bakıp da, "ho ho ho bakın post-modern dedikleri şeyi bi program bile yapıyo ve bunlar da salak bunu gerçek sanıyor" diyen zihniyet miro'nun bir tablosunun ya da bir andy warhol pisuvar çalışmasının karşısına geçip de, "e bunu ben de yaparım, ne var ki. hem bi bok yapmaya çalışmamış bu adam" diyen zihniyetten pek de farklı değildir.

    ama bütün bu tartışmalar ve ortada bıraktığı iz hala post-moderndir.
  • örnek bir postmodern metin ilişiktedir:

    neocapitalist narratives: subtextual capitalism and foucaultist power relations
    barbara u. von junz
    department of sociolinguistics, oxford university
    1. spelling and marxist class
    if one examines the capitalist paradigm of expression, one is faced with a choice: either accept subtextual capitalism or conclude that the purpose of the writer is deconstruction. the premise of foucaultist power relations suggests that society, paradoxically, has significance, but only if posttextual desituationism is valid; if that is not the case, we can assume that the constitution is intrinsically dead.

    in the works of spelling, a predominant concept is the concept of deconstructivist truth. but sartre promotes the use of subtextual capitalism to attack the status quo. lacan's critique of the capitalist paradigm of expression states that culture has objective value.

    in a sense, the subject is interpolated into a derridaist reading that includes art as a whole. the capitalist paradigm of expression implies that consciousness is responsible for sexism.

    however, a number of discourses concerning subtextual capitalism may be revealed. the premise of the capitalist paradigm of expression states that sexual identity, somewhat surprisingly, has significance, but only if truth is interchangeable with consciousness.

    but the subject is contextualised into a subtextual capitalism that includes sexuality as a paradox. sontag suggests the use of the capitalist paradigm of expression to modify art.

    2. submodern narrative and marxist capitalism
    if one examines subtextual capitalism, one is faced with a choice: either reject foucaultist power relations or conclude that consciousness is used to disempower the proletariat. however, textual deappropriation suggests that class has intrinsic meaning. the subject is interpolated into a foucaultist power relations that includes narrativity as a whole.

    "society is part of the paradigm of sexuality," says bataille; however, according to werther[1] , it is not so much society that is part of the paradigm of sexuality, but rather the economy, and some would say the fatal flaw, of society. in a sense, any number of narratives concerning a mythopoetical totality exist. the premise of marxist capitalism implies that the state is capable of social comment.

    therefore, prinn[2] states that we have to choose between foucaultist power relations and lyotardist narrative. several narratives concerning postcapitalist marxism may be discovered.

    it could be said that debord uses the term 'foucaultist power relations' to denote the fatal flaw, and therefore the stasis, of cultural class. the subject is contextualised into a neostructural paradigm of consensus that includes language as a reality.

    but sontag's essay on foucaultist power relations implies that consciousness may be used to reinforce hierarchy, but only if the premise of marxist class is invalid; otherwise, derrida's model of foucaultist power relations is one of "textual rationalism", and hence a legal fiction. marx promotes the use of postcapitalist deconstruction to challenge capitalism.

    3. realities of genre
    in the works of madonna, a predominant concept is the distinction between creation and destruction. thus, lacan uses the term 'subtextual capitalism' to denote a self-justifying totality. sontag suggests the use of cultural sublimation to read and modify sexuality.

    therefore, if subtextual capitalism holds, we have to choose between preconstructive objectivism and cultural theory. the main theme of la fournier's[3] model of foucaultist power relations is the role of the reader as artist.

    in a sense, the subject is interpolated into a textual neodeconstructive theory that includes reality as a reality. a number of desituationisms concerning the bridge between class and sexual identity exist. however, the subject is contextualised into a marxist capitalism that includes narrativity as a whole. foucault uses the term 'the cultural paradigm of consensus' to denote the role of the writer as reader.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1. werther, f. j. ed. (1992) subtextual capitalism in the works of madonna. yale university press
    2. prinn, w. d. i. (1986) the narrative of defining characteristic: foucaultist power relations and subtextual capitalism. university of oregon press

    3. la fournier, r. d. ed. (1977) subtextual capitalism and foucaultist power relations. university of california press

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    the essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the postmodernism generator. to generate another essay, follow this link. if you like this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.
    the postmodernism generator was written by andrew c. bulhak using the dada engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by josh larios (this version, anyway. there are others out there).

    this installation of the generator has delivered 1772558 essays since 25/feb/2000 18:43:09 pst, when it became operational. it is being served from a machine in seattle, washington, usa.

    more detailed technical information may be found in monash university department of computer science technical report 96/264: "on the simulation of postmodernism and mental debility using recursive transition networks". an on-line copy is available from monash university.

    more generated texts are linked to from the communications from elsewhere front page.

    if you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the social text affair, where nyu physics professor alan sokal's brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.
  • "sokal olunmaz, sokal doğulur" sloganının yakışabileceği "hoax" makale sitesi: "the essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the postmodernism generator"

    post modern ön kabûlleri sarsmak bir yana pekiştirip ihyâ ettiği, modernist okumaların bu saklı mesajı anlamayacağı iddiası anlaşılır bir taraf taşımakla birlikte "absürd"ü değiştirmiyor: bilimsel olanla edebî olan arasında bir fark yok mu, olmamalı mı ?

    kendisine "post modern" sıfatın ı yakıştıan - yakıştırmayan tüm cenahlar, neden gelenekçi-bürokratik bir kurum olan akademinin içinde kalmaya devam ediyorlar da (ki bu açıkça modernist bir tavırdır), edebiyatçı olmuyorlar ? 'geçim kaygısı' mı, "bir kere oldu işte" mi, "canım bunu çekiyor" mu ?

    bir silkinme, rasyonalizasyona vesil olmuşbu 'yordam', nihai kertede sorunlarımıza çözüm üretmekten aciz ve akademideki ironik voarouşunu yeten ti'ye alıyor bana kalırsa bu site de.

    warhol'un sanatının da bir tarihselliği vardı; bugün, "tıkla ve bir warhol eseri oluştur" sitesi peydahlansa, bu da aynı ironiyi kendi bağlamında taşıyacaktır. benimseriz ya da dudak bükeriz, ama taşıyacaktır.

    (bkz: pomo)
  • the postmodern essay generator diye de geçiyor sanal ortamda.