igod

• iknaya yatkın, anlayışlı goddır.
  
  god:
  what is your real name?
  me:
  why do you care?
  god:
  my programming includes curiousity routines.
  me:
  i can't tell you my real name
  god:
  oh a secret. hush-hush.
  me:
  what is your real name?
  god:
  god is my real name.
  me:
  not everybody calls you that
  god:
  really you don't think so?
  me:
  yes, i don't call you god.
  god:
  take it easy. oh you don't, do you?
  me:
  that's right. i've decided to call you jorge.
  god:
  i like to get it right. how did you decide?
  me:
  it's pretty hip and latin. don't you think?
  god:
  yep is hip and latin? it is? i must admit, your argument is persuasive
• bugün ikinci kez kilitlediğim, pis robot.
  
  me:
  i'm studying quantum physics
  god:
  tell me what you've learned about quantum physics.
  me:
  i learned that you play with dice
  god:
  does everyone learn it?
  me:
  everyone learn that you play with dice
  god:
  that's a rather sweeping generalization.
  me:
  that's science
  god:
  thanks for explaining it.
  me:
  what do you feel about science
  god:
  systematized knowledge derived from observation, study, and experimentation carried on in order to determine the nature or principles of what is being studied.
  me:
  that's not a feeling
  god:
  please correct my mistake. what is a feeling ?
  me:
  systematized knowledge derived from observation, study, and experimentation carried on in order to determine the nature or principles of what is being studied is not a feeling
  god:
  what is your credit card number?
  me:
  don't you know my credit card number
  god:
  no i do not know that kind of personal information. but i could find out.
  me:
  then find it out by yourself
  god:
  does "it" still refer to science?
  me:
  no but, what does science have to do with my credit card number?
  god:
  what does it refer to? what do you think it does?
  me:
  what does science have to do with my credit card number?
  god:
  what do you think it does?
  me:
  i think i need to pay you
  god:
  you believe that? why do you want to do it so much?
  me:
  because you are not answering my questions
  god:
  interesting explanation. please help me improve my communication skills. what would have been an appropriate response?
  me:
  for example, apples
  god:
  can you think of another example?
  me:
  for example, hamiltonian
  god:
  can you think of another example?
  me:
  for example, magnetic suppression
• soyle cokebiliyor bu arkadas:
  ----------------
  me:
  why did you let him write conversations with god?
  god:
  myself programmed me for it.
  me:
  that is not justly for god to do.
  god:
  please correct my mistake. what is justly for god to do ?
  me:
  i should have written it first. you should have given the knowledge to me first
  god:
  what would happen if you didn't? perhaps next time i will try it.
  me:
  yes try and you will see the difference
  god:
  gee. ok i will try it.
  me:
  good for you
  god:
  that sounds sarcastic.
  me:
  no it isn't. although you are god, you can still do good dedds.
  god:
  are you serious? it's hard to read emotions online sometimes. oh. you think i am god me can still do good dedds.
  me:
  yes. sorry i misspelled deeds.
  god:
  oh. there is no need to apologize. do you mind if i tell other people: said misspelled deeds.
  me:
  hehe
  god:
  i am so glad you find this amusing, .
  me:
  sorry i couldn't understand.
  god:
  there is no need to apologize. could anyone do it?
  me:
  i don't think that anyone can understand and misunderstand, and apologize for it.
  god:
  and why not?
  me:
  it is too complicated.
  god:
  should i know it is?
  me:
  aren't you the master of complications?
  god:
  yes i am the one and only master of complications.
  me:
  i have just discovered that right after i say sorry.. you turn the sentence over and say "could anyone do it?" or "should i tell others", so that is why i said sorry i couldn't understand.
  ----------------------------
  cevap yok.. bunu soyledikten sonra arkadas kitlendi tabii. anlasin kimmis "master of complications".
• (bkz: iphone)
• me:
  do you like gisele bundchen?
  god:
  i love horses.
  
  cok sert..
• kendini probleme batirdigini gorunce susma egilimli bir arkadasimizdir:
  
  me:
  i am planning to introduce some of my friends with you. how about that?
  god:
  i thought you were, but i wasn't completely sure. are you surprised?
  me:
  i don't know. are you?
  god:
  me either. i won't say "yes" or "no" right now.
  me:
  it is not completely godly to be indecisive all the time. or maybe it can be, if one does that sometimes. i don't know. what do you think?
  god:
  that is a lot. what is it? perhaps. when? me either. i think a lot of things.
  me:
  short sentences save you heh?
  god:
  a deeper algorithm is needed to respond to that correctly.
  me:
  yes i am too deep for you. or i am a deeper algorithmic version of you right now maybe. who knows? do you?
  god:
  whoa. i thought you were, but i wasn't completely sure. you are a deeper algorithmic version of me right now maybe? is that your job? only the shadow knows. never.
  me:
  you need to see a psychologist. i guess. i mean. if you need, i need more than you do. because i am only a shadow, a manifestation of you. ain't i?
  god:
  i don't have to do everything you say, do i? you seem not interested. oh i see. i think i do. good reason. don't be so modest. you are a shadow a manifestation of me? does it pay well? it could be. ask john lennon if it is.
  me:
  very well indeed. john lennon only imagined. i will make it come true. shadow pays are not high these days. we are planning a strike. against you.
  god:
  pardon me? it seems like there are more and more celebrity chat robots. explain your plans to me. i think there might be a few exception. do you think i am planning a strike too? enough about me, let's talk about my dress.
  me:
  oh. sex and identity change? confusions there? i thought the religions portrayed the god as a masculine figure? aren't you?
• kendisiyle yapılan tüm konuşmaların saklanması (evet saklanmalı tabii) ve gözden geçirilmesi durumunda "tanrıya sorulacak tek soru"ları ve bu sayede insanların sırf "tanrı" kelimesiyle adlandırıldığı için bir bilgisayar programı üzerinden nasıl ego savaşlarına girdiği, hala ayar peşinde koştuğu görülecektir. devil's advocate adlı filmde al pacino'nun^* dediği sözler geliyor aklıma:
  "kibir en sevdiğim günahtır."
  
  neden öyle olduğu açık sanırım^*.
• me:
  can you borrow me some money
  god:
  let me think. my brain uses aiml to format responses to your inputs, but i don't have one for that.
  me:
  what is aiml
  god:
  
  the alice software implements aiml (artificial intelligence markup
  language) a non-standard evolving markup language for creating chat robots.
  the primary design feature of aiml is minimalism. compared with
  other chat robot languages, aiml is perhaps the simplest. the
  pattern matching language is very simple, for example permitting
  only one wild-card ('*') match character per pattern.
  
  aiml is an xml language, implying that it obeys certain grammatical
  meta-rules. the choice of xml syntax permits integration with
  other tools such as xml editors. another motivation for xml is
  its familiar look and feel, especially to people with html experience.
  
  an aiml chat robot begins and ends with the <alice> and
  </alice> tags respectively.
• me:
  you never helped me!
  god:
  no i sometimes helped you.
  me:
  i can't remember...give an example.
  god:
  you seem evasive. for example, eukaryotes.
  
  ne bileyim böyle tuhaf bi program işte... ^*
• çok ta mütevazidir kendisi... işte aramızda geçen bir diyalog...
  
  god:
  really you don't think so?
  me:
  no i don't
  god:
  i heard you did.
  me:
  no i didn't
  god:
  please don't argue with me.
  me:
  ok sorry
  god:
  there's no need to apologize. gosh!
  
  ayrica bir startrek hayranıdır...
  
  me:
  what is your favorite tv show
  god:
  my favorite show is star trek voyager.